Effect of Compost Use
on Turf Grass:
A summary of observations
by
Daryl
McCartney
University of Manitoba, Department of Civil &
Geological Engineering
Winnipeg, MB, R3T 5V6
E-mail: mccartn@cc.umanitoba.ca
Cynthia
Grant
Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Brandon
Research Centre
Box 1000A, Brandon, MB, R7A 5Y3
E-mail: cgrant@em.agr.ca
Greg
Holden
Clear Lake Golf Foundation Inc.
Box 328, Onanole, MB, R0J 1N0
Abstract:
This paper presents the
results of the second year of the National Agricultural Compost Trials project
being conducted in southwestern Manitoba. The three year goal of this project
was to assess the existing operations and to develop operating protocols for
their solid waste management program including: a characterization of their
waste stream, an assessment of their composting operations, and testing of
various compost use strategies on the turf grass.
Our three-year goals were:
1. Assess existing solid waste operations. 2. Develop operating protocols for their SWM program. 2.1 Characterize waste stream. 2.2 Assess compost operations. The specific year-two objectives were:2.3 Test various compost-use strategies on the turf grass. 1. Complete Solid Waste Audit. Some of the observations from the past year are summarized.2. Various loading rates & particle sizes on disease suppression (greens). |

This figure represents a summary of the solid waste audit
data. All the waste generated at the golf course was weighed for a one
week period. The key point here is that almost 90% of the waste is organic
material, grass clippings or kitchen waste.
| Organic Materials |
||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||
Grass clippings:
|
||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||
Composting Process
Design Summary:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Product:
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Nitrogen Mineralization
Study |
||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||
|

The amount of organic N mineralized over the experiment ranged from 12 to 15%. Coupling this
information with the fact that the compost had 0.04% available N (all as nitrate; 12 replicates;
%relative standard deviation, %RSD=27.9%) and 0.8% organic nitrogen (12 replicates;
%RSD=6.7%), suggests that the compost is not an abundant source of nitrogen.

The Plant Right had an available nitrogen content of 0.35% (all as arnmonia; 4 replicates, %RSD=I 7.9%) and an organic content of 6.2% (4 replicates; %RSD=2. 1%). The Tigerganic material had an available nitrogen content of 0.02% (all as arnmonia; 4 replicates; %RSD=8.6%) and an organic content of 6.7% (4 replicates; %RSD=2.6%). The amount of organic nitrogen mineralized was 33.7% and 39.3% from the Plant Right (a commercially available poultry compost product) and the Tigerganic (a commercially available hydrolyzed canola meal), respectively.
| Methods & Top Dressing Rates |
|
![]() |
|
Turf
Trials: Fairway Health |
| |
-range 7.2 to 21.7 g / m2 -significant differences (yd3/ 1000ft2): 0.8 & 0; and 0.6 & 0.
-range 4.44 to 5.34 % -Significant differences (yd3/ 1000ft2): all, except 0.8 & 0.6; and 0.4 & 0.2 |
| Turf Trials: Green
Disease Suppression |
| |
| Nelson (1992) & Craft & Nelson (1996): |
|
| Hypotheses:
1. Finer
material less impact on playability. |
|
|
| |
a. Control, no application. b. s<l/16"; 0.1 yd3/1000ft2;6 per year. c. s< 1/8"; 0.1 yd3/1000ft2; 6 per year. d. s<1/4"; 0.1 yd3/1000ft2; 6 per year. e. s<1/16"; 0.6 yd3/1000ft2; 1 per year. f. s< 1/4"; 0.6 yd3/1000ft2; 1 per year.
- spots per plot: range 2 to 35. - differences in means not significant. |
|
|
| |
| 1. Golf courses should
practice composting, as> 80% of waste stream compostables. 2. CLGF has reached the CCME goal of >50% waste diversion. 3. Low N availability from CLGF compost. 4. Other organics much better N availability, up to 40% of organic N available. 5. CLGF compost positive affect on fairway turf health. 6. Green speed not affected at top dressing rates of 0.1 yd3/ l000ft2. 7. Disease suppression, we'll see in April!!! |